Growth Does Not Equal Prosperity
Nanaimo is growing. But are ordinary citizens actually getting ahead?
Nanaimo is growing. No one seriously disputes that.
More people. More houses. More traffic. More tax notices. More public spending. More ribbon-cutting language about “investment,” “vibrancy,” and “planning for the future.”
But here is the uncomfortable question: if Nanaimo is growing, why are so many people still looking for work?
The latest numbers are not flattering.
Nanaimo’s unemployment rate was 8.5% in May 2026, only slightly better than April’s 8.7%. That puts Nanaimo well above B.C. at 6.8%, above Canada at 6.6%, and far above the United States at 4.3%.
| Area | May 2026 Unemployment Rate |
|---|---|
| Nanaimo | 8.5% |
| British Columbia | 6.8% |
| Canada | 6.6% |
| United States | 4.3% |
Note: Canadian and U.S. unemployment numbers are not measured in exactly the same way, so the comparison is not perfect. But the broad picture is still useful: Nanaimo’s labour market is weak compared with the province, the country, and the U.S.
NanaimoNewsNOW also reported that Nanaimo was tied for the fifth-highest unemployment rate among 41 monitored urban centres in Canada, and second-highest in B.C., behind only Kelowna.
That should matter in an election year.
Growth Looks Good in Reports
Politicians and planners love growth because growth looks good in reports.
Population growth can mean more development applications. More housing starts. More building permits. More grant applications. More justification for expanding departments. More pressure to hire staff.
And yes — more people to tax.
But a growing tax base is not the same thing as prosperous citizens.
A city can grow while its people fall behind. A city can build more housing while housing becomes less affordable. A city can hire more public staff while the private job market struggles. A city can collect more taxes while ordinary households feel poorer every year.
That is the difference between growth on paper and prosperity in real life.
Prosperity Is Not a Planning Slogan
Prosperity is not measured by how many cranes are in the sky.
It is measured by whether people can find decent work, pay their bills, raise their children, support local businesses, and still have something left at the end of the month.
If the city is growing but unemployment remains high, then citizens should be asking harder questions.
- What kind of economy are we actually building?
- Are we creating good private-sector jobs, or simply expanding a taxpayer-funded service economy?
- Are we attracting employers who produce wealth, or mainly managing the pressures created by population growth?
- Are we building a city where working families can thrive, or one where citizens are squeezed between rising taxes, rising rents, rising costs, and uncertain employment?
This matters because government does not create prosperity simply by spending money.
Government can move money around. It can tax. It can borrow. It can subsidize. It can hire. It can regulate.
But real prosperity comes from productive work, private investment, business confidence, skilled labour, and citizens having enough disposable income to support the local economy.
When those pieces are weak, growth can become a burden instead of a blessing.
A Wake-Up Issue for Nanaimo Votes 2026
Nanaimo’s current jobless numbers should be a wake-up call. Not panic. Not doom. But a sober warning.
The city may be getting bigger.
But bigger is not automatically better.
Growth that simply produces more taxpayers, more bureaucracy, more public spending, and more pressure on households is not prosperity.
It is just a larger system feeding itself.
A truly prosperous Nanaimo should not be satisfied with population growth while unemployment sits at 8.5%. It should not be satisfied with being near the top of Canada’s jobless list. It should not be satisfied with saying “growth is happening” while too many citizens are wondering where the decent jobs are.
Because at street level, prosperity is not a planning slogan.
It is a paycheque. It is a stable job. It is a business that can afford to hire. It is a family that can afford to stay.
And right now, Nanaimo’s jobless numbers suggest that growth alone is not delivering that promise.
Election-Year Footnote
The recent controversy over Nanaimo’s proposed data centre is a useful example of how some council members appear to think about economic development.
Coun. Hilary Eastmure has publicly expressed concern about the project, while critics have argued that data centres may provide some short-term construction work but relatively few permanent local jobs once built.
That raises a fair election question: when Nanaimo’s unemployment rate is already among the highest in the country, should council be quick to dismiss any serious private investment simply because it may not solve the whole jobs problem by itself?
In a city struggling with employment, the issue should not be whether one project creates every job Nanaimo needs. The issue should be whether council is creating the conditions for many kinds of private-sector investment, employment, and opportunity to take root.
Nanaimo Votes 2026
Get informed. Ask better questions. Do your civic duty.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your input. Your comment will appear once reviewed.