B.C. HEALTHCARE MORE MONEY - BETTER SERVICES?

 



🎙️ VOICE of NANAIMO
▶️ Click Play to listen

B.C. Health Care: More Money, Same Delivery Problem

The problem in B.C. health care is no longer just money. It is delivery.

By the province’s own budget figures, B.C. health and mental health operating spending rises from $21.266 billion in 2019/20 to a planned $38.404 billion in 2028/29. That is an increase of $17.138 billion, or about 80.6%. And that is mainly the day-to-day cost of delivering health services — staff, programs, services, and system operations — not the full upfront construction cost of major capital projects like cancer centres, hospital towers, and other large facilities. Those capital costs are tracked separately in the capital plan, while amortization flows into operating expenses over time.

That distinction matters, because it means taxpayers are not just seeing a big increase in total health-system burden. They are seeing a huge increase in the basic cost of running the system before fully counting the bricks-and-mortar price tag of major expansions.

So the obvious public question is this:
what extra benefit has flowed back to the taxpayer?

That is the real test.

Government can point to billions more in spending, more hiring announcements, more recruiting, more facilities, and more plans. But taxpayers do not experience health care through budget charts and press releases. They experience it through delayed appointments, unstable ER service, long waits for testing, surgical backlogs, and uncertainty when something serious is wrong.

That is why the province’s talking points do not settle the matter.

Yes, B.C. can say it recruited more health professionals. Yes, it can say it is adding capacity. But the public is entitled to ask harder questions.

Has it become easier to get a family doctor?
Are emergency rooms more stable?
Are cancer screenings happening faster?
Are surgeries being done sooner?
Are diagnostic waits shrinking?
Are smaller communities getting dependable service?

Those are the value-for-money questions.

And the public impression, backed by too many headlines to dismiss, is that B.C. still has a delivery problem.

People remember emergency room interruptions and reduced hours. They remember Vancouver Island communities struggling with staffing shortages. They remember long waits making the news. They remember hearing about patients being sent elsewhere because the system could not handle demand fast enough. They remember all of this while being told government is spending more than ever.

That is not what success feels like.

Nobody doubts that health care is expensive. Nobody doubts that frontline workers are under pressure. Nobody doubts that an aging population and growing demand create real strain. But taxpayers are still entitled to ask why an 80% jump in basic operating spending has not produced a clearly stronger and more reliable public experience.

Because if spending rises dramatically and access still feels fragile, then the problem is not simply funding.

It is delivery.
It is management.
It is accountability.

Taxpayers do not live inside spreadsheets. They live inside the actual system.

And right now, the actual system still feels too strained for the amount of money flowing into it.

Comments