BORROWING IS A CLAIM ON NANAIMO'S FUTURE




🎙️ VOICE OF NANAIMO
▶️ Click Play to listen

Councillors: Borrowing Isn’t “Found Money” — It’s a Claim on Nanaimo’s Future

To Nanaimo City Council:

You’re being handed new powers to borrow more money with less public friction. The question is whether you’ll use that power like leaders — or like gamblers.

Because debt is not a policy position. Debt is a bill. And the bill shows up every year as debt servicing — money that gets paid before roads are repaved, before facilities are repaired, and before “core services” are restored.

If you want a real-world example of what this looks like when it grows out of control, look at the Province.

In its 2025/26 Second Quarterly Report, British Columbia forecasts debt servicing expense of $5.092 billion

Now connect that to a headline everyone understands on Vancouver Island: a cardiac cath lab is often discussed as roughly $100 million. At $13.95 million a day in debt servicing, one week of provincial interest equals one cath lab — give or take.

That is what “deficits steal tomorrow” means in real life: interest becomes the first claim on public money, and urgent needs become “too expensive.”

Now here’s the uncomfortable part for Nanaimo: the Province just made it easier for municipalities to travel the same road — quietly.

The new reality: “no-vote” borrowing has expanded

Provincial rules set a municipality’s maximum “liability servicing limit” at 25% of controllable and sustainable revenues. That’s the absolute ceiling.

But inside that ceiling is an approval-free zone: the Province states the approval-free liability zone is 10% of controllable and sustainable municipal revenue — and once a municipality’s total annual servicing cost exceeds that 10% limit, “all subsequent borrowing must receive elector approval.” 

The Province didn’t hide the intent. A 2025 news release from the Government of British Columbia says municipalities can now borrow up to 10% of annual revenue without a public vote, and that the change increases longer-term “dependable revenue” capacity from 5% to 10%.

In other words: the system has been redesigned to make borrowing easier — and elector approval less automatic.

Nanaimo’s own staff spelled out what this means: up to ~$185 million

This isn’t theoretical. Nanaimo staff put the consequences in black and white in a September 17, 2025 report:

  • The approval-free zone increased from 5% to 10%.

  • Under the new amendment, the City can incur an additional $15.52 million in annual debt servicing costs without elector approval.

  • Staff note Council’s current debt policy requires elector approval for all long-term borrowing — but it’s a Council policy and Council can amend it.

  • And staff state that if Council amends the policy, then based on the Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia indicative interest rate and 20-year amortization, the City could borrow up to approximately $185 million without elector approval

That’s not a rounding error. That’s a major debt trajectory — potentially approved with no public vote at all.

Legal doesn’t mean legitimate

Council can always say: “It’s within the rules.” Fine. But residents are entitled to ask the higher standard question:

Is it legitimate to mortgage 20 years of taxpayer capacity on decisions voters never explicitly approved?

Because debt doesn’t just fund projects. It funds constraints:

  • Less flexibility when emergencies hit

  • Higher taxes when costs rise

  • Deferred maintenance when “there’s no room”

  • And the permanent excuse: “Sorry — we can’t afford it.”

That’s not theoretical either. The Province’s own fiscal update forecasts an $11.187B deficit for 2025/26.When borrowing becomes routine, deficits become routine — and interest becomes its own mega-program.

A leadership pledge Nanaimo needs now

So here are the commitments I’m asking you to make publicly — not because you must, but because you should:

  1. Voluntary voter approval for major long-term borrowing
    If the debt is big enough to change Nanaimo’s tax path for a decade, treat it like referendum-level consent — even if the Province allows an approval-free zone.

  2. A one-page “Debt Service Impact Sheet” before any borrowing vote
    Show the annual debt service, the sensitivity to interest rates, and what gets squeezed if costs rise.

  3. A bright-line “core services first” standard
    No borrowing for “nice-to-have” projects until core services and maintenance backlogs are honestly funded — and publicly reported.

Final Thought

Councillors: you now have a wider “no-vote” lane. Nanaimo staff have told you that lane could reach ~$185 million if you amend your own policy. 

Use that power wrong, and you’ll create the same trap the Province is in — where huge public needs compete with an interest bill that gets paid first.

Remember the cath lab math: about one week of provincial debt servicing equals a ~$100 million cath lab. 

That’s what “Deficits Matter” means.

 They will eat your lunch and steal tomorrow.




Comments